with my boyfriend of seven months. He has VERY bizarre opinions and want help understanding him, and getting him to understand how others see у have been with my boyfriend, Henry, for around 7 months

with my boyfriend of seven months. He has VERY bizarre opinions
and want help understanding him, and getting him to understand how others see
у
have been with my boyfriend, Henry, for around 7 months now, and he's amazing guy etc.
really see this developing into a long and very serious relationship. There are no big
problems or red flags.
One thing that gets me though, are his political opinions. They are esoteric, somewhat
incomprehensible, and frankly, bizarre. He is an ardent monarchist (we are in the but not
in the typical use of the word liking the Queen being an impartial head of state), he literally
believes in the divine right of kings and that it is the only natural form of government. He
claims to recognise no monarch since James and apparently the real legitimate successor
is some guy called Francis who I've never heard of, who is also supposedly the rightful king of
France and Greece. He never votes, saying he has no desire to assist his monarch in their
choice of servants (which is technically how the government works, the Queen “chooses”
whoever wins the election). He expressed disgust at Prince Harry's recent engagement,
pressed him as to why (1 was slightly worried it was racist in nature) and he said both Meghan
Markle and Kate Middleton are commoners who have no business marrying royalty, then made
some remark about the Royal Family being a “ghastly bunch of arriviste Germans anyway, so
suppose it doesn't matter”. It's just strange. It’s like his worldview is so odd and so far removed
from anything can even begin to understand. can name the current major Royals and a few
of the more important historical ones, whereas he is an absolute expert.
He will passionately debate anyone who wants to, though again it just makes him look strange.
Friends at dinner will be discussing normal, contemporary political issues, and he will interject
and on some tangent about how this all relates to “King John’s submission to Papal
authority in 1213". He does seem to genuinely believe this stuff, but it gives an odd impression
to those around No one can really reply because they don't know what he's talking about,
so he definitely gets the feeling he’s winning these debates (he's far too well-mannered to be
rude about it, but it's certainly an unspoken truth in his view).
8